Sunday, January 5, 2014

CONTROL = BONDAGE

Politicians, bureaucrats, and especially judges would have you believe that too much freedom will result in chaos. Therefore, we should gladly give up some of our RIGHTS for the good of the community. In other words, people acting in the name of government, say we need more laws and more jurors to enforce these laws--even if we have to give up some RIGHTS in the process. They believe the more laws we have, the more control, thus a better society. This theory may sound good on paper, and apparently many of our leaders think this way, as evidenced by the thousands of new laws that are added to the books each year in this country, let alone our STATE. But no matter how cleverly the MARXIST argument is made, the hard fact is that whenever you give up a RIGHT you lose a FREE CHOICE.

CONTROL = BONDAGE

Rather than give up RIGHTS, we should be giving up WRONGS.
more laws do not make less criminals. 


Start reading you Constitution and encourage others to do the same. It is a Contract with your government of which you are the beneficiary. 



If you don't know your rights, You don't have any.

The legal system is not your friend. It is made of of men who, as we know to well, are tainted with a sinful nature. If you don't believe that, sit in on your local courts and observe your legal system. It has devolved into who can manipulate the verbage, and who can dig out the proper applicable case law.  It  is not about honor, justice, conscience, or morality.  

 The Bedrock solid United States Constitution is THE supreme law of the land and all Judges are bound to it under Oath of office. 


"All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void." 
Marbury vs. Madison, 5 US (2 Cranch) 137, 174, 176, (1803)




There are immense resources available on the constitution. what it means to you. and how it applies in it's entirety, or it does not apply at all.  Do not for an instant think it is being protected on your behalf by a caring and benevolent government.  Our Constitution is under deliberate, repetitive attack and God bless those few who stand to defend it for all our sakes present and into the future! 

Enjoy the video series by Carl Miller. An Expert on the Constitution and Bill of Rights





"Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human liberty; it is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves"
~William Pitt. British House of Commons




The strongest standing case of constitutional supremacy: Marbury vs. Madison, 5 US (2 Cranch) 137, 174, 176, (1803) 

NEVER overturned. ALL judges fall under jurisdiction of the United States constitution.

"All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void"



"Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them. "
Miranda vs Arizona, 384 US 436 p. 491

"An unconstitutional act is not law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties; affords no protection; it creates no office; it is in legal contemplation; as inoperative as though it had never been passed."
Norton vs Shelby County
118 US 425 p. 442

The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form and name of law, is in reality no law, but is wholly void, and ineffective for any purpose; since unconstitutionality dates from the time of its enactment, and not merely from the date of the decision so branding it.
"No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it. "
16 Am Jur 2d, Sec 177
Late 2d, Sec 256


Article VI. Paragraph 2
This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the Supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every state shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.. ... .






2 comments:

  1. Apply the above to a Zoning ordinance imposed on a United States citizen property owner with secured constitutional uninfringeable rights to Property by an unelected governmental board standing on an imposed "ordinance" And If our governments are under authority of the United States constitution, and oaths of office are sworn to uphold the Supreme Law of the Land, is not any attempt to circumvent an individual's constitutional rights an act of sedition against the Supreme Law of the Land?

    USC TITLE 18 Sec. 2384. If two or more persons in any State or Territory, conspire to overthrow, put down, or destroy by force the Government of the United States, or delay the execution of any law of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined not more than $20,000 or imprisoned not more than twenty years or both. Which attests the extreme importance of any public office holder swearing an oath to uphold the Constitution of the United States, and the potential penalty for breaking it. Somebody swore an oath, even if the appointed board did not, somebody is responsible.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Do attorneys take an oath to the United States constitution? Do attorneys on county retainer? Somebody authorizes legal action on behalf of a county. It's an extremely bold move to take such action. In 1943, Murdoch vs Pennsylvania ruled that no state may convert a secured Liberty into a privilege and issue a license and fee for it.

    ReplyDelete