Sunday, April 27, 2014

Beaverton Schools Blog posts Review

With the election coming up next week, we though we'd compile some of the previous opinions posted on the BRS bond proposal. 







Your vote has long term ramifications and sends a message to the BRS leadership
that long term funding solutions for short shelf life items are now the new normal in the Beaverton Community. 
That the perceived comfort of today, will be paid for by the very students that find employment here tomorrow.  and that the fixed income of a vast majority of our community, must dig just a little bit harder in those couch cushions to find the pocket changed required to make BRS truly safe and secure into the future.




DISCLAIMER:

Some of this information figuratively is outdated.
The posting review has very relevant points made but we admit due to the timing of the posts, there are caluculations that are not correct.

what we do know is that.
This is a $6.1 million loan to be spent over the next two-three years by the present board. Payments will be made over the next 16 years with interest. There will be no additional money for the remaining 14 years of the loan. This is deficit financing. 

http://www.beavertonone.com/faqs/

Wednesday, April 16, 2014

April 17th Monthly Meeting


Reminder!
Thursday April 17th is our monthly meeting at the Cedar River Chapel 
 2766 S River Rd, Beaverton, MI 48612

Our Guest will be 4th District House Candidate Peter Konetchy

Part time legislature petitions are available for signatures and circulation

Precinct Delegate Affidavits need to be filed by 4pm, May 6th. 





See you There! 
Bring a Friend!

Tuesday, April 1, 2014

What's up in Washington? What's up in Michigan?

Politics can be confusing and down right maddening when you try to decipher what direction or position a political party is heading.  The rhetoric ebbs and flows with election seasons, but the voting records rarely match the campaign promises. 



You likely have heard that district 4 house United States House representative Dave Camp, chairman of the powerful tax-writing House Ways and Means Committee, plans to retire after his current term, he announced this Monday.

Why would A safe moderate Republican not seek, what some would say, was an easy re-election? Dave has served in Congress since 1991 and assumed control of the committee when Republicans retook control of the House in 2011. But his six-year term as top Republican on the panel is scheduled to conclude at the end of the year. It is understood he has battled and weathered cancer, and likely just needs some time for reflection, some family time.  Thank You for your Service Dave Camp. 

Dave Camp, the stalwart tax reformer and job creating policy maker has slidden noticeably left over the years. We appreciate his constitutional stances when they occured, but the opportunities to improve the tax code were missed. The efforts reminiscent of pouring water from one end of the pool to the other.  And don't forget TARP!  Cash for Clunkers, NDAA, Patriot ACT and a consistent voting record to raise the debt ceiling.  The timing for the resignation is acceptable. Washington seems to impose an insurmountable amount of pressure to meddle with markets and toil with few tangeable results. 

But who will run to take that seat for Republicans? ! 

There is a Constitutional candidate that has been in the race and campaigning for Constitutionally limited government with bold ideas that seem foreign to Neo-Conservatives, since for all the talk of supporting and defending the Constitution, few have seen it implemented by an elected official with their votes.  

His name is Peter Konetchy, He resides in Roscommon;  he understands American greatness, and has a vision of how to preserve it.  That vision is simply that if our elected representatives voted in accordance with the limits of our constitution, The engine that made this country great would be reborn. The solution, is the Constitution! 


Traditionally, The republican party supports their incumbent, right or wrong, it's the way it is.  But upon knowledge that their GOP 4th district Constitutional incumbent was closing shop, and the race wide open for them, why would they actively recruit from a pool of  potential primary candidates of which would be  easily considered "career politicians"? 
 Why do you think the traditional, Establishment GOP rarely acknowledge this candidate on their ticket? on their team?  Why would the party that stands on the platform of limited government and conservative judeo-christian values rooted firmly in our founding documents.....Not cling to this candidate? Not fund this candidate? 

I can't answer that but you should certainly mull that question over for yourself.  If you have been a tried and true Republican and have continually accepted the top down information conduit and endorsement schedule,  It's high time you start doing some research into what the party stands for in their platform, as well as in their actions. 


Review a very acceptable platform. Click the Link below:

A solid conservative candidate has been attending as many  GOP events as possible and meeting county republicans at their meetings, as well as conservative TEA, 9-12, and C4L group meetings to introduce himself and his campaign focus.  Peter Konetchy is not obscure when it comes to the inner circle of District 4 political activism. 

As of yesterday, an un-official but firm announcement came in that John Moolenar from Midland, current 36th district Senator is joining Pete in the primary. With Jim Stamas from Midland, 98th house, stepping up to run for the 36th senate seat being vacated by Moolenar.  
Now, John served three terms in the house of representatives; will have served a 4 year senate term, and now is eyeing a united states seat being vacated by Dave Camp.  John will have  been in public service for 10 years

Jim Stamas will have served two terms as 98th house of representatives  and is eyeing the 36th senate seat being vacated by John. 

Preceding John Moolenaar in the 36th senate was Tony Stamas. Tony Stamas served 2 terms as 98th house rep, then held the 36th Senate for two four year terms.  That's 12 years. 

Few consider the term "career politician" to be favorable. although it sure does seem the 4th district republican establishment finds it a prerequisite for "electability"  

I am not saying these are bad men, I just truly believe that you can't get different results by performing identical actions. 


Some would argue you need the experience to enter and be effective in Michigan and National politics.  To some degree they are likely correct. But if we elect representatives who's sole allegiance is to the United States Constitution,  allegiance to the playbook our founders set in motion and not to the political advocacies that fund partisan politics, might this nation be in much better shape? Would the NDAA ever see the light of day? Would the patriot act ever be a threat to united states citizens and their bill of rights? Imagine the most perfect political system devised by men held to account by us, and by them to each other?

My vote will be cast for candidates experienced in our constitution over partisan gamesmanship each and every day. 

Private / Public partnerships must end. Letting government choose "winners and losers" through tax incentives and funding grants at our expense must end. The tentacles of the MEDC must be dis-lodged.  If we are to talk about tax incentives to stimulate economic growth?  that will need to be universal.  Wealth redistribution schemes are alive and well in  both viable political party vehicles today. 

I urge all politically active agents to reassess your priorities and allegiance. 

 I urge all American voters to reassess you values and weigh them against the two major political policy vehicles of today. Search and you will see, the solution IS the Constitution. 



Please seek limited government, moral, fiscal, Constitutional Candidates!

Please Visit Peter konetchy's website link below:
and please consider any donation you can afford. 

www.peterkonetchy.com




Wednesday, March 5, 2014

A State-wide effort to Restore Michigan’s Citizen-driven, Part-time Legislature.

A Committee has been formed with it's sole purpose being the adoption of an amendment to Michigan’s constitution to restore the citizen-driven, part-time legislature that Michigan once enjoyed.


The Committee to Restore Michigan’s Part-time Legislature has language approved, petitions printed, and the distribution is underway! 

  
This is not a Partisan issue! This is a Regulatory Freedom Issue! 


The barrage of new legislation every session is creating layers of bureaucracy and intrusive regulations that stifles job growth, and outside investment in our State. 

Consider that when we send a new representative to Lansing, they are allowed to present (10) new bills from their district the first month, with 5 per month every month after.  Now multiply that by 110 house members and 38 senators! That's alot of law making ideas, and alot of time that could be better spent concentrating on a balanced State budget. 

A house member recieves over 80K in compensation and the typical work week is Tues, Wed, Thursday, and back in district for the rest. 
They serve only 120 days. 
The amendment will limit the session to 60 consecutive days with a compensation of 35K.  If this schedule were in place today, our legislature would have convened January 15, 2014, and would be wrapping up with a budget agreement next Friday March 14th. 


Our Legislature cannot solve our economic problems through increasing rules and regulations. 

An interesting study was performed back in the 1993 on what the actual cost of just one bill is to get it to the floor. 

A Legislative Analyst report on the “Average Cost of a Bill” reveals when you add bill printing, associated publications histories, files, indexes, journals, chapters and reprints, bill room operation, Legislative Counsel services, Legislative committee staff, Department of Finance services, and Agency legislative liaison costs, the total 1991-1992 session cost was $13,733 PER BILL. And that was from the 90's! Just imagine what the cost of a bill is now. Wow what a HUGE savings for the taxpayers of Michigan! 
http://www.geoffmetcalf.com/WNDARCHIVE/19553.html



So while cost savings on salaries and less bills to process will be considerable, they pale to the amount it will save Michigan tax payers in the long run when business in Michigan returns to a greater degree of regulatory freedom from future onerous laws that hinder job creation and investment. The reward will be more jobs created by a more stable regulatory environment. 

Special interest lobbyists have set up shop surrounding our capital. They literally only have to walk across the street to access our representatives to garner support on issues that may, or may not benefit our districts directly. By limiting the time in Lansing, the lobbyists will have less time to influence, and there will be less time to draft the new legislation that the lobbyists are asking for.  When our reps come home from their 60 days session, it would be best that the lobbyists come to us, and lobby us the citizens through town halls so we know what we're being asked to fund as a district. 

This is will truly be a citizen driven effort. There will be very little support from representatives. Townships, Cities, and Counties operate with part time public servants, not full time career politicians. We can put "public service" back in Lansing. 

Visit www.parttimemi.com to learn about the inititative, read the FAQ. And watch the videos. Share with your family, friends, and co-workers. This will not be on our ballot without citizen sharing of the information.  




The petitions are available in Gladwin County
Call 989-435-8851 
or email wethepeople48624@gmail.com for information

The petitions are available to sign at:
Kocur Krew Automotive
1694 M-61
Gladwin, MI






You must be a registered Michigan voter to sign the petition. Of course you can only sign once!

See if you are registered to vote 


It took a Constitutional Amendment back in 1963 to make Michigan a full time legislature.  It will take all of us working together to restore it to part time as it was originally intended. 











Wednesday, February 12, 2014

Are The Courts Cashing In On Us?

After watching the video of the last commission meeting I was struck by two things:

1. We are going to be asked to pass a Headlee Restoration millage.

2. The courts as much as told the commissioners they would give them more revenue in exchange for some clerks.

I want you to ask yourself something: How do the courts make revenue?



We've made a clip from the video we watched so you can see what we are talking about. 

So how do they make revenue? They don't make anything. They don't sell anything.

That's right: Fines, fees, costs.... They make revenue off you and me, folks.

Not only were the courts given back full funding for their clerks in exchange for more revenue, now we're asked for more taxes too?

Insult to injury, taxpayers. Do we have your attention yet?

I don't know about the rest of you, but I will not support a judge at re-election time who traded an increase in fines, fees, and costs for a secretary.

Administration of justice? Sort of sounds like a perversion of justice.

Tuesday, February 11, 2014

Here a Mil, There a Mil, EVERYWHERE a Mil, Mil......

The public safety millage in Gladwin County for 1 mil failed at the last election.
We reported that the true intent of the public safety millage was not to fund public safety but to fund county operations since the Sherriff's department in each county is State mandated. 

Well, leave no option to ask for money gone to waste.  Because here it comes again. 

We've had lots of commissioner seat changes in a very short time since the last budget battles took place before the first of 2014. With new commissioners comes new ideas on how to govern and fund. But sometimes the new ideas are just the old ideas refurbished. 

Exhibit A


Not surprising, but definitely disheartening since the public safety millage was supposed to be the last effort by commissioners to solicit the public's opinion before having to negotiate reductions in county department contracts. 
There was much work, much arguing, much sleep lost, many threats, cars keyed, garbage spewed, you know, the normal adult county government tactics when budgeting decisions come to a head. 

What a shame that a few commission seats change and the entire ship takes a course more in line with the prevailing winds......

I'm used to the barrage of public funding requests but as for me, a Gladwin County republican precinct delegate,  this latest development has me tweaked just a bit more than usual. so I ask you.......What is a Republican? 

We have ONE Republican Commissioner in Gladwin County. Who pipes up and suggests a headlee roll back and a realized 1.34 mil ballot question in may?


We have ONE Republican Commissioner in Gladwin County. Who pipes up and suggests restoring Court clerical help to full time in exchange for more revenue?
 FINES, FEES, COSTS. it's cannibalism, It's usery

We have ONE Republican Commissioner in Gladwin County  Who is this republican that boasts at county party meetings that he is consistently opposed and out voted by his democratic counterparts? (although in 6 months of taped meetings there is no proof of any votes not unanimous)


I don't even need to say his name. It's not about him. It's about a party that supports him and does not look into his actions. It's where we fail as a political policy vehicle with an adopted, clearly defined platform. We are the party of limited government.  Right sizing government to demographics without knee jerk public funding requests to pacify County departments heads and judges, honors the logical right wing of the three headed eagle. 


A VERY short time ago, court secretaries were put on part time in just part of many efforts to get our county budget in line so the budget could be sent to the state as balanced without lying to them and having to borrow to make it to the next fiscal year end, We HAD a commission chairman making a noble effort to hold the county departments accountable and submitting a realistic affordable budget to the State of Michigan as mandated. 



                                              There is never an election or ballot free from local government's hands out.

                                      Brace yourself Gladwin County funding requests and all the emotional propoganda that accompanies them are heading your way full steam ahead. 


Friday, January 17, 2014

To Jump? Or Not To Jump?

"If your friend told you to jump off a bridge

Would you do it?"





Even if he had a degree in physics and a trunk full of bungee jump safety manuals? 





And your other friends were putting on jump gear with Indifferent shrugs to their future safety since your expert friend is confident and assured this is for not only your own good, but for all of your children combined? 




And if you consider not suiting up, is your position perceived radical and selfish since you're concerned about what might become of your own children, as well as your friend's children? 





And if you try to reason that you think you might have found a way to traverse the treacherously steep and rocky embankment down to the cool, clean water of sustainence that they are all craving, albeit a little more difficult, and a little slower, while preserving each other and our children in the process, would they listen? 






And if they plead there is no time and the most direct and satisfying indulgence is directly over the guard rail, then look at you and ask.....



 "Are you in or out?, we can't do this without you." 



What would you choose.......